Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition
From: "Jean-Claude Berger" <>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:10:11 +0200
References: <> <000f01c002eb$5ab734a0$> <005101c002f1$16c72e20$> <001d01c002fb$5ece5040$>

Hi Craig,

Sorry about the misunderstanding and my lack of artistic sense. I did not
realised. Do you really think we finally saw the mysterious Leica GLOW?

Seriously (well), the picture is even better when we look at it in the HTML

All the best,

- ---
Jean-Claude Berger (
Systems and RDBMS consultant (MCSE)
Lyon, France

> Really, Jean-Claude!  Have you no artistic sensitivity, Monsieur?  THAT is
> salon-quality example of the gorgeous, creamy "Leica look" many of us
> attempt to achieve by the judicious use of thumbprint impregnated UV
> filters.   (BTW, if the same image is rendered by a Nikkor or Canon lens,
> the proper characterization is "blurry").
> You will note on his Website that Herr Lang offers lessons in digital
> scanner use.  With proper instruction ANY of us can achieve results such
> his!
> Craig
> Boston

In reply to: Message from John Brownlow <> (Re: [Leica] Vacation... lighten up)
Message from "Craig Roberts" <> (Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition)
Message from "Jean-Claude Berger" <> (Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition)
Message from "Craig Roberts" <> (Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition)