Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 1
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:18:52 -0400

- -----Original Message-----
From: Ted Grant []
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 11:45 AM

Miro Jurcevic wrote:
> Us poorer members of the LUG can only drool at the idea of 9 M's. That's
> more than any dealer normally has in our neck of the woods.<<<<<<<<<

I became a pro and discovered you can't do it like you know you should
with just one.


Well, sure Ted, I can see the pro needing more than one M,  but NINE!!!
Even you don't need nine when out on assignment, do you (and I'm talking
about M rangefinders here; not R and M cameras)?

I might wish I had maybe one more M body (although what I really drool over
is having more lenses than the one I have), but nine M cameras sounds like
gluttony to me, even if you need a spare in case one fails on you.  I think
I would be embarrassed to own nine M's -- wouldn't stop thinking about all
the poor starving photographers out there who don't even have one!


Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 1)
Reply from Ted Grant <> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 1)