Re: [Leica] flare in shadows

[ralph fuerbringer <rof@mac.com>]

we are forced to announce that secret tests of coated vs uncoated lenses
have benn inconclusive. if we get any more money with this scam our
reputations may be sullied. we've got enough now selling uncoated lenses
to drop the scam for 2 years.our secret partner deep@hhole a 3-card montee
guru and our idea person says no one on the list can remember a visa pin
number that long. all who turned in aspherics as down payment for oldie
maybe gooodies will receive their uncoated lenses by photokina time.
sandpapering hard coating to remove it from some summicrons takes an
unwarranted amount of time but we're not charging extra.we're in the catbird
seat because deep@hole convinced us to drop our plan for a chain letter on
this list.this is a fuc..whole lot better. in fact its a fu veritable
phoenix! reno cant touch us, so we're off to hawaii first for a multifruited
mai tai. then to the chinese site to pick up our kermit green
m6s and miss piggy r8s in pink. deep@whole will join us on the orient
express to photokina. we will post no more in this thread before its time:
macworld 2002. thanks all for your contributions. aloh from ralph and co.


> From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 16:08:23 -0700
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] flare in shadows
> 
> Krechtz@aol.com wrote:
>> <Snip> 
>> No, it's a birth control pill.  Novira goes on top of the cream cheese on top
>> of the bagel.  Provia F is a terrific slide film by Phoogee, right?
>> 
>> Joe Sobel
> 
> But seriously folks... If we are talking about "did's Bruce Davidsons deal
> there
> on the low contrast lenses have any use for increasing shadow detail" we are
> talking black and white. And it was mentioned that he was talking PRE Tri x.
> But of course once Tri x came out in 400 then they could all throw their
> strobes
> away right????!!!
> Mark Rabiner