Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]physically certainly .it is only deep set lenses primarily the early superwide angles that stuck back too far. anything with an ordinary back cap wont conflict with the meter arm. the only caveat is the short base of the rangefinder. it may or may not focus accurately as it was designed primarily for an f4 90. likewise the cle's i have, but of three of these 1 was on nose at minimum and medium focus w/an 85 f1.5 nikkor wide open. i have a gg gadget that represents the m body, compared the settings on it and what rf read. i'd say you've got a 1 in 3 chance that wide open it will be in perfect focus. why the variation, dont ask.ralph > From: Harvey Weiss <harvey.weiss@yale.edu> > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:08:49 -0400 > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > is it possible to use the new 2/90 APO ASPH on the CL? > >