Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Postmodernist lens review
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:41:06 -0500
References: <6aa52e18-6fbe-4f8b-bc63-c82a494f23cd@gmail.com>

I would believe that the lens delivers such distorted images that the
company is a division of Lens Baby and would be comparable to a 58mm F1.2
Minolta shot wide open.  Also your comment about academic aspirations is
close to the mark.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 9:11?PM Peter Klein via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
wrote:

> While looking at user lens "reviews," I came upon this at B&H. It's for
> the new-ish Olympus 90/3.5 macro lens, by user "Gg."
>
> "This lens represents an aesthetic experience of meaning making. It is a
> purposeful investment in espousing a visual philosophy. In a world where
> dichotomies abound this lens is at the intersection of
> texture-tangibility and substance-purpose. This lens allows your intent
> to be based upon why you see what you see. This lens will be used for
> Street Photography where Impressionism can reveal elements of a
> transitory nature within ourselves."
>
> (Give this person an Assistant Professorship immediately! Or not...)
>
> --Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


-- 
Don
don.dory at gmail.com


In reply to: Message from boulanger.croissant at gmail.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Postmodernist lens review)