Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2023/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Monday Misc.
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 20:12:18 +0100
References: <CA+3n+_=JLU-hCqQ8oanOmcH4kCSMhq7MBy_j_BXbEbe=jOWx2Q@mail.gmail.com>

The doggie wins. As usual.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
photo at frozenlight.eu

http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu

????? ???????! ?????? ?????!






> On 4 Dec 2023, at 12:00, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> Greetings to all.  Last week we had some discussion about using vintage
> lenses on our digital cameras.  This week I took a walk around the
> neighborhood with a prewar 35mm Zeiss Biogon originally in a Contax mount.
> I did have the lens CLA'd by Harry Scherer maybe 15 years ago while also
> overhauling a Contax II.
> 
> First is an example of only OK performance at infinity:
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/extension.jpg.html
> 
> Next is a close image at f2.8:
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/got+treats.jpg.html
> 
> Last is an intermediate distance image, this time at f5.6:
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/turkey+legs+added+to+extend+the+holiday.jpg.html
> 
> If you recall this is the lens whose rear element protrudes so far rearward
> that it is unusable on the postwar Contax line.  There is possibly three
> stops of falloff in the edges on my R V sensor but overall is a fair
> performer and an excellent performer considering no coatings and 86+ years
> old.
> 
> All the best.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Don
> don.dory at gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Monday Misc.)