Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Reclusive Monarch
From: leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans)
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 20:41:34 -0700
References: <fb46bb20-9f89-d356-d06f-4e68d83c49cf@lighttube.net>

Like WOW!? I don't know if any lens could have done a better job.? Shows 
it it the photographer, not the equipment.? Thanks for this amazing shot.

Aram

On 9/3/2021 1:16 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> Thirty years ago, when computers were getting involved in lens design, 
> I was shooting a Pentax Spotmatic.? I visited a consignment shop in 
> Ft. Worth and spotted a Soligor 35/f 2.0 lens in m43 mount, a FL I was 
> missing, so I bought it. I later learned that the C/D inscription 
> meant it was computer-designed. I decided today to take the lens out 
> for a spin.? (Did I mention that this lens focuses down to 1 foot?)? I 
> spotted two butterflies around the Buddleia, so I moved in closer and 
> tried with no success to get some images.? The smart insects managed 
> to keep foliage between themselves and the camera. Finally, I saw the 
> Monarch fly away from the Buddleia and I snapped in that direction.
>
> I got a single image of the butterfly.
>
> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20210903-DSCF2691-Enhanced.JPG.html
>  
>
>
> I know my 50-200 Oly lens would have done a better job, but it 
> wouldn't have been a challenge.
>
-- 
Aram Langhans
(Semi) Retired Science Teacher
& Unemployed photographer
  
?The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself 
would ever have dared dream.?
    James D. Watson



In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Reclusive Monarch)