Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What is the definition of "Fine Art Photography"?
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:51:24 +0530
References: <4519A97F-0649-45CC-8874-6156875405EA@cox.net> <53571990-58B8-4014-8BBD-2F654BBD0FB9@earthlink.net> <74cc08ca-e32b-077f-a86c-f2b22b15c3b7@iol.ie>

IMHO, all of you are needlessly getting too complex in your descriptions.

Fine Art Photography is nothing but what you can sell, just like Fine Art.

Cheers
Jayanand



On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:30 PM Douglas Barry <imra at iol.ie> wrote:

> Not quite. Fine Art is art that rich people collect, and poor people
> rob, so that they can fence it to middlemen who know that they can find
> a buyer for it.
>
> The first large auction house started selling photos in the early 1970s,
> but photos had been collected for years in families, and certain
> collections were regarded as very fine, just as certain photographers
> were regarded as above the common or garden shutter pressers.
> People started to pay a little more for these photographers' work and
> their interesting, glamorous, adventurous or tragic lifestyles. This
> bigging up attracted both the interest of art entrepreneurs and critics
> and media coverage expanded the market exponentially. The constant media
> exposure and the vested interest of new art pushers ensured the
> persistent redefining of the judgement criteria of an evolving market by
> a coterie of people who have an interest in profiting from a beautiful
> and inventive artistic medium. Oh look, here is someone new and
> wonderful doing new and wonderful things, don't caught out and show your
> ignorance of their genius, be wise and buy their stuff now!!
>
> It echoes the approach to the painting market.
> What are you at,
> Mr Basquiat?
> Your suggestive dichotomy
> More frontal lobotomy
> To me?  Just tat.
>
> Douglas
>
>
>
>
> On 27/05/2021 05:14, Doug Herr via LUG wrote:
> > My definition - which I expect is not widely accepted - is photography
> that has to be explained to be understood.
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Birdman of Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com <http://www.wildlightphoto.com/>
> >
> >
> >> On May 26, 2021, at 6:58 PM, Stasys Petravicius via LUG <
> lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Stasys Petravicius
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from stasys1 at cox.net (Stasys Petravicius) ([Leica] What is the definition of "Fine Art Photography"?)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] What is the definition of "Fine Art Photography"?)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] What is the definition of "Fine Art Photography"?)