Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Your new feeder certainly is paying off! Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right" > On 12 May 2020, at 21:56, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: > > My backyard birds are getting more familiar with my addition to the > feeders. I am experimenting to see if, with distance reduced, I can get > better images without the 2X optical extender. The first two images > included the extender. > > The Blue Jay has not shown a tendency to scatter seeds, so I have set the > springs to allow him access: > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20200512-P5121503.JPG.html > > The Rose-Breasted Grosbeak male in his formal attire: > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20200512-P5121512.JPG.html > > These next two images were shot without the optical extender, so > necessitated more enlargement: > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20200512-P5121519.JPG.html > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20200512-P5121526.JPG.html > > I personally prefer the shots without the extender. > > -- > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ >