Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is the 28/35/50 Tri Elmar a retrofocus design?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:44:44 +0100
References: <CAOgCMTS6=imo6fNp53stTUBWphE6FYmaBAm8+pTe3r+64TF8mg@mail.gmail.com> <3BAFDA48-A878-4540-A07D-EE7E7B00C268@frozenlight.eu> <CAOgCMTQx9Wd-=wGf6QRPo-44cvsmf9BS5EOF7MU1UGS=vjD3cg@mail.gmail.com>

I understand. I looked at Erwin Puts?s review of the Tri-Elmar but he does 
not mention this issue.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>

YNWA

"I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right"












> On 17 Feb 2020, at 08:21, Frank Filippone via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> I would like to use the lens on a Sony A7 family body. Retrofocus wide
> angle lenses have less image quality problems. There is no info I can find
> for this combination.
> Thus the question
> 
> Frank
> 
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:39 PM Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Why is this important?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> 
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <
>> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <
>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>> 
>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <
>> http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>> 
>> YNWA
>> 
>> "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 17 Feb 2020, at 06:14, Frank Filippone via LUG <lug at 
>>> leica-users.org>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Does anyone know the answer to this question?  I have been unable to find
>>> the answer myself....
>>> If no one knows, I will ask Leica....
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>> Note that the 16/18/21 Wide Angle Tri Elmar is a retrofocus design, but I
>>> already know that....
>>> 
>>> Frank Filippone
>>> BMWRed735i at gmail.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> -- 
> Frank Filippone
> BMWRed735i at gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Is the 28/35/50 Tri Elmar a retrofocus design?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Is the 28/35/50 Tri Elmar a retrofocus design?)
Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Is the 28/35/50 Tri Elmar a retrofocus design?)