Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The moving abstracts are not bad but I still prefer the straight shot?impressive! Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right" > On 2 Feb 2020, at 13:56, Jayanand Govindaraj via LUG <lug at > leica-users.org> wrote: > > The second installment of Uluru photographs comes from a gigantic art > installation called the Field of Dreams, which is acres of open land > densely packed with LED bulbs of various colours. It switched on at dusk, > and switched off at dawn. Unfortunately, no tripods are allowed into the > area, or in the viewing galleries. Because of this, and the fact that > descending darkness forced high exposure times, I decided to experiment by > moving the camera around during exposure. I am a fan of the Abstract > Expressionist school of painting, and this method, to me, seemed to > duplicate the spontaneity in creation that the group believed in. > > > > As dusk fell the lights were switched on, and this is the straight shot: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/auatralia/uluru/Australia-20200116-723.jpg.html >