Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/10/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That is a good point, of course. I use Amazon cloud as my backup these days. But I still want a local version to work on. I doubt that I would ever rely 100% on the cloud. Cheers, Nathan > On 19 October 2017 at 09:42 Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Their cloud based processing bit, Lightroom CC (as it is now known) is > clearly aimed at the camera phone user. Why are you even bothered with it? > I am actually evaluating backing up my complete photo files (8-9TB) on > Amazon Glacier or equivalent. If you do not trust your files to reside on > the net safely, it beats me why you keep money in the bank. Big banks are > far less trustworthy than the big tech companies! > > Cheers > Jayanand > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard at > gmail.com> > wrote: > > > 11,99 ? here, to allow access to my files? Why should I pay for that? > > > > http://www.adobe.com/fr/creativecloud/photography. > > html?mv=search&s_kwcid=AL!3085!3!216697395257!b!!!! > > lightroom%20adobe&ef_id=WehUswAABRhGHmET:20171019073059:s < > > http://www.adobe.com/fr/creativecloud/photography. > > html?mv=search&s_kwcid=AL!3085!3!216697395257!b!!!! > > lightroom%20adobe&ef_id=WehUswAABRhGHmET:20171019073059:s> > > > > Amities > > Philippe, who still needs some reassurance ;-) > > > > > Le 19 oct. 2017 ? 09:27, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> a > > ?crit : > > > > > > If you needed Lightroom, why would you not pay? To me, this seems a > > > very > > > strange discussion, involving US$10 a month, in a forum full of Leica > > > owners! Talk about being penny wise and pound foolish! > > > > > > Cheers > > > Jayanand > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at > > > verizon.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Not so sure I communicated properly.. if you use CC, and you do NOT > > >> pay, > > >> your program is basically useless. It will not work. > > >> > > >> If you use ANY of the "perpetual license versions", you get no > > >> updates, > > >> but you can always use it. Using Adobe Camera Raw, a free program, you > > can > > >> always have camera model updates that will allow you to convert from > > RAW to > > >> some other format, and use your V1.0 of LR to process it... > > >> > > >> Frank Filippone > > >> Red735i at verizon.net > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Philippe <photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com> > > >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > >> Sent: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:19 > > >> Subject: Re: [Leica] lightroom > > >> > > >> That?s if you upgrade the camera body Jayanand.I could still run the > > >> original LR 1.0 if I kept using the cameras I had at the > > >> time.AmitiesPhilippe> Le 19 oct. 2017 ? 08:02, Jayanand Govindaraj < > > >> jayanand at gmail.com> a ?crit :> > Adobe's perpetual licenses > > >> required > > >> upgrades every two years which cost way> more than what I pay over two > > >> years with the Cloud Subscription.> > Ditto for Microsoft Office.> > > > >> Economically, the CC is the way to go!> > Cheers> Jayanand> > On Thu, > > Oct > > >> 19, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>> > > >> wrote:> >> > > >>>>>>>> The standalone version of LR Will not be supported after Dec 31. > > >> No more>> revisions, enhancements, added cameras, etc after that > > >> date.>> > > >> Adobe is making so much money from the subscription service, the>> > > >> additional income from the perpetual versions are no longer worth it. > > >> Or > > >> so>> it appears.>> They now own us. You either pay your monthly fee or > > your > > >> images are>> basically as you took them. Your enhancements, crops, etc > > are > > >> no longer of>> any use. You would need to do them over again with some > > >> other SW.>> If you have not figured it out yet, do not trust any > > promises > > >> from Adobe.>> >> Frank Filippone>> Red735i at verizon.net>> >> >> > > >> _______________________________________________>> Leica Users Group.>> > > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information>> > > > > > >>> _______________________________________________> Leica Users Group.> > > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > > >> information_______________________________________________Leica Users > > >> Group.See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > > information > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Leica Users Group. > > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information