Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] lightroom
From: dankhong at gmail.com (Dan Khong)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:35:10 +0800
References: <77881C73-7403-43F5-AB31-E8BB68E5348B@gmail.com> <15f3361962f-c09-62a1@webjas-vae097.srv.aolmail.net> <CAH1UNJ1mXZL57b+kfh8bWZ=VTSMC5v-6t_APTfm0Dxug-3R+zA@mail.gmail.com>

$10 per month? Jayanand, you have overpaid. It?s actually $9.99.

Dan K. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 19 Oct 2017, at 3:27 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> If you needed Lightroom, why would you not pay? To me, this seems a very
> strange discussion, involving US$10 a month, in a forum full of Leica
> owners! Talk about being penny wise and pound foolish!
> 
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> 
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Not so sure I communicated properly.. if you use CC, and you do NOT pay,
>> your program is basically useless.  It will not work.
>> 
>> If you use ANY of the "perpetual license versions", you get no updates,
>> but you can always use it.  Using Adobe Camera Raw, a free program, you 
>> can
>> always have camera model updates that will allow you to convert from RAW 
>> to
>> some other format, and use your V1.0 of LR to process it...
>> 
>> Frank Filippone
>> Red735i at verizon.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philippe <photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com>
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:19
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] lightroom
>> 
>> That?s if you upgrade the camera body Jayanand.I could still run the
>> original LR 1.0 if I kept using the cameras I had at the
>> time.AmitiesPhilippe> Le 19 oct. 2017 ? 08:02, Jayanand Govindaraj <
>> jayanand at gmail.com> a ?crit :> > Adobe's perpetual licenses required
>> upgrades every two years which cost way> more than what I pay over two
>> years with the Cloud Subscription.> > Ditto for Microsoft Office.> >
>> Economically, the CC is the way to go!> > Cheers> Jayanand> > On Thu, Oct
>> 19, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>> wrote:> >>
>>>>>>>> The standalone version of LR Will not be supported after Dec 31.
>> No more>> revisions, enhancements, added cameras, etc after that date.>>
>> Adobe is making so much money from the subscription service, the>>
>> additional income from the perpetual versions are no longer worth it. Or
>> so>> it appears.>> They now own us. You either pay your monthly fee or 
>> your
>> images are>> basically as you took them. Your enhancements, crops, etc are
>> no longer of>> any use. You would need to do them over again with some
>> other SW.>> If you have not figured it out yet, do not trust any promises
>> from Adobe.>> >> Frank Filippone>> Red735i at verizon.net>> >> >>
>> _______________________________________________>> Leica Users Group.>>
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information>> >
>>> _______________________________________________> Leica Users Group.>
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>> information_______________________________________________Leica Users
>> Group.See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] lightroom)
In reply to: Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] lightroom)