Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 Adam Bridge <abridge at mac.com>wrote: >I think the message is: things have changed. What you used to count appears to be seriously broken. >It doesn?t matter what Leica ONCE meant, it?s how the behave today. Right now it stinks of boutique and not pro. If the gear doesn?t have the stamina, >and the company doesn?t stand behind it in a timely manner, then it?s not pro. >Adam ===================================================================================================================== I agree. I'm not sorry I couldn't afford a digital M. I've had my Fuji X-E2 for 3-3/4 years without a problem, and it seems more versatile. I don't think I'd be able to use my Olympus Zuiko 250 f/2 on an M9. Or my 55mm Micro-Nikkor. Or a half dozen other favorite lenses that I can use. -- Alan Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Photo Services (Retired) UPAA Photographer of the Year 1978 UPAA Master of the Profession 2014 amr3 at uwm.edu http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/ "All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for an inability to notice. " - Elliott Erwitt