Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2017/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] noct .95 ?
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:38:38 -0400
References: <268387B0-20F8-4C31-87B5-A6FC5D279531@mac.com> <CAAsXt4N9BphLjWD7uHt8knUkxNaB+JzNQKZmsbVQaUWFue_MkQ@mail.gmail.com> <MMXP123MB140825DBCD64CC56FA7781FDF9A10@MMXP123MB1408.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
curious about why your preference for the 1 over the .95
ric
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
> To be honest, I use my f1.0 far more than the f0.95.... but neither are
> for sale ;-)
>
> john
>
Replies:
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Reply from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
In reply to:
Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)