Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/01/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can't speak to anything technical, but I just shot some test images with a 10. It handles well, it's very quiet. The LCD seems huge and it addresses my 2 complaints about the 240, it wakes up much quicker and the buffer doesn't choke up. Leo Wesson leowesson.com > On Jan 30, 2017, at 14:05, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > > Because there is a short distance between the rear element and the sensor > there are micro lenses to aid as you get further from the sensor. Also a > thinner glass cover. > > http://www.the.me/the-leica-m-max-sensor-explained/ > > These are the reasons that M non-retrofocus lenses do not play well with > standard Sony, and I have read neither with the SL, compared to SLR style > lenses. > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > What does this mean: > > "Jesko: It?s true that it is a really brand new sensor. Of course the > experience from SL and Q take action also in developing the sensor for the > M system. It is not the same, even though it is same spec 24 MP and the > performance is also quite similar. but it is a unique sensor, and M lenses > need a special certain design especially the micro lens shift, special > glass package.? > > I?m wondering about the last sentence about micro lens shift and special > glass package? Is that about the sensor or the lens that needs the special > design? > > Thanks > > Adam > >> On 2017 Jan 30, at 5:33 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: >> >> http://leicarumors.com/2017/01/29/leica-m10-interview-why-no-video-where-is-the-typ-label-compressed-dng-files-and-more.aspx/#more-44744 >> >> john >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information