Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2017/01/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] The "problem" with the M9
From: pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 00:07:01 +0000
References: <D4909A1C.68BFA%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CY1PR1001MB109718CD0BF24D782171221EB8610@CY1PR1001MB1097.namprd10.prod.outlook.com> <05ac01d266e3$c991ca70$5cb55f50$@verizon.net> <ca1a939806e34a2fa24dc2e7fc7dde33@WhizzEXM01.whizz.org> <05d401d266ee$0df33d20$29d9b760$@verizon.net> <AC614999-6B18-47DB-8734-EF080D27C061@gmail.com>
On 05/01/2017 01:21, Steve Barbour wrote
To me, the question is which way works [...] consistently better pictures
[...for you ] and which way you enjoy.
>
...and I think that's it, you hit the nail on the head.
Peter
--
===========================================================
Dr Peter Dzwig
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The "problem" with the M9)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram) ([Leica] The "problem" with the M9)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] The "problem" with the M9)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] The "problem" with the M9)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] The "problem" with the M9)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] The "problem" with the M9)