Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/11/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] NAS question.
From: spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:18:10 -0500
References: <CAG8EVmyzbzBa91qpjV1QooxkEA14v70jFq+koVJCOwjXXmphaQ@mail.gmail.com> <ec87a07539814f33a206088efc4760f4@WhizzEXM01.whizz.org> <CAG8EVmy+isUNNctusq3GBZd3yf7TvcrCzFx49+tK=Sq+uvvoJw@mail.gmail.com>
 
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 18:18, Leo Wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> At this point I am talking about backing up to the NAS.  I have always felt
> that TimeMachine is too redundant; should I just get over it and use it?
> I"m using the current OS.
> 

TimeMachine is not a bad automated incremental backup solution. If you have 
nothing better, I would suggest you use TimeMachine. It?s supported by Apple 
and used a lot of Mac users. I only know of one TimeMachine backup failure. 
TimeMachine recognized the failure and automatically did another full backup.

Regards,
Spencer
Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] NAS question.)
 In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] NAS question.)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] NAS question.)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] NAS question.)