Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2016/09/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:59:34 -0700
References: <3102AFDA-E450-4F4B-AB03-A7A8973AE34A@fastmail.com> <7BCAB2D88BEE4631BE521C119C7DED49@Family> <90B0C0EE-5AE3-4F98-8BB9-320F53FEC347@icloud.com> <79fb744e-74f8-58ce-5ba0-79d6cf19e7c5@lighttube.net> <BD577D48-2917-4446-880C-F209BB4F3358@frozenlight.eu>
> On 17 Sep 2016, at 15:58, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote:
>>
>> That is a nice format. Both Nathan and I are using the Fujinon 27mm,
>> which gives the equivalent of a 40 full frame. It is a very handy
>> walk-about lens.
yup a great little lens. Also I have the penny ltd 43mm and adapter,
wonderful.
steve
In reply to:
Message from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)