Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?
From: photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe)
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:24:05 +0200
References: <FAFE63D0-2637-420C-B80C-17BA42BA057A@fastmail.com>
 
best compromise between FL and aperture value - ratio
cryptic but true I'm sure

Amities
Philippe

Le 16 sept. 2016 ? 18:15, Adam Bridge <abridge683 at fastmail.com> a ?crit :

> I?m just wondering if anyone knows since 43mm would be the more rigorous 
> focal length for tradition 35mm film.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Adam Bridge
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
 In reply to: Message from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)