Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Ethics in photography
From: hlritter at twc.com (Howard L Ritter Jr)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 00:33:22 -0400
References: <4a3a3531-2a67-cd64-2708-b0caf08757e9@cox.net>
 
Yes.

?howard


> On Aug 14, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
> 
> Here is today's question.  I am out of photo mailers, so I go to Staples 
> to get some more.  I don't use them that often, so bought a pack of 11x14 
> for $7.99.  At checkout, the cashier says that will be 54 cents.  I say, 
> that can't be right unless there is some really extreme sale.  The cashier 
> says it is, that is how it scans.  Now the price is preposterous on its 
> face, since I'm sure there is nothing in the store that sells for 54 
> cents.  So, the question is, should I have brought it to a manager's 
> attention instead of buying out the remaining store stock?
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Ethics in photography)
 In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Ethics in photography)