Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thoughts on photographing art
From: george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:45:36 -0500
References: <CANYyKx83wqagW6HvQjqfMuyTjr6zeHXxav+ZAAC_faDAh+RreQ@mail.gmail.com>

> On Jun 3, 2016, at 11:55 PM, Alan Magayne-Roshak <amr3 at uwmalumni.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016  Adam Bridge <abridge683 at fastmail.com>wrote:
> 
> 
>> I?ve been asked by a local artist to help her photograph and make prints
> of her paintings.
> 
>> I was wondering if any of you who might have done this before can give
> some suggestions about best focal-length lens to use for this? I was
> thinking that, >longer is better? I?ll be shooting work that?s lit with
> camera and art on tripod and easel, using remote shutter release etc.
> 
>> Any thoughts on technique would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>> Adam Bridge
> =========================================================================================================================
> I used to use an 85mm on full-frame when possible, ideally in a dark studio
> with polarizers on two lamps (rotated 180 degrees apart) and over the lens,
> plus a non-polarized side light skimming the work for a bit of paint
> texture.  The polarizers minimize glare, but too much increases contrast,
> so you have to play around with the amount of polarization to match the
> original.  I'd shoot one frame with a Macbeth chart in front of the
> painting to help with color matching.
> 
> If possible, use prime lenses with low distortion so the painting has
> straight edges.

superb technique

Regards,
George Lottermoser 

http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwmalumni.com (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Thoughts on photographing art)