Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 reliability question
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:32:58 +0000
References: <B7874C91-D17C-48C3-BC3C-784AC35909F6@frozenlight.eu>

If it is cheaper, why is buying one without a sensor replacement a 
non-starter? Leica will replace it for free (probably with a minor CLA) , 
recalibrate and send it back - just you would be without it for a few 
weeks...

My M9 has been totally reliable since I bought it in 2010.

john

-----Original Message-----

I have always said that once the M9 prices come down to a level that I am 
prepared to pay, I will buy one. Well, in the past week I have seen two for 
sale, for $2500 and $2200, respectively. The one I saw this morning has had 
the sensor replaced. Those prices are within my range, but I now have doubts 
about reliability. Clearly, buying an M9 that has not had a sensor 
replacement is out of the question; but in case one has had it, is the new 
sensor reliable?or is it just a matter of time before it starts rotting just 
like the original one did? And are there other reliability issues besides 
the sensor? Digital Leicas have not exactly had a stellar record.

TIA,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 reliability question)