Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy
From: gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 19:40:13 +0100

As most of you will know i was a Fuji X-World photographer shooting with two 
 X-Pro1s and a variety of lenses, and I was fairly happy. However in July 
last year I moved back to Leica after about 13 years and purchased a used 
M9. I had shot with Leica Ms for many years but changed when I made the 
decision to go digital, and Leica simply did not have a digital body, and 
appeared to have no intention of producing one. It cost me a lot of money to 
switch back but I was rapidly approaching 70 and decided if I couldn?t have 
what I wanted at my age it was a sad world!

I have submitted to Alamy for many years, and have around 4,000 images with 
them. I am always very careful about quality when I submit because they are 
pretty fussy, but I found that I was only getting about a 50% acceptance 
rate with the Fuji cameras, and could never work out why. The images looked 
fine to me on the screen. It was a real problem.

I have now made 17 submissions using Leica images, and have not had a single 
failure! That makes the change really worthwhile. Others will say ?Of 
course, you should have known? but I would never have thought it would be 
that obvious!

Gerry


Gerry Walden LRPS
www.gwpics.com
+44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
+44 (0)797 287 7932








Replies: Reply from gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy)
Reply from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy)
Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy)
Reply from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy)