Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Both a Digital Split Image overlay and Focus Peaking as manual focus aids are available on my Fuji XT-1, which accepts M lenses quite effortlessly with an adapter. In fact Fuji themselves make an adapter. Cheers Jayanand On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Peter Klein <boulanger.croissant at gmail.com> wrote: > In theory it should work just fine. You leave the lens on infinity, and the > adapter does the rest. The adapter must: > > -Interface to the camera's AF electronics such that the camera can tell it > "forward, back, stop"). > -Be thin enough to allow infinity focus. > -Contain motors and a mechanism that will rack the lens out sufficiently to > focus the lens to a reasonable close distance. The mechanism must fit in > the adapter. This is easier to do with SLR lens adapters. M lenses have a > shorter back focus distance, and M to mirrorless adapters are quiet short > compared to SLR adapters. Perhaps some of the mechanism could be below the > adapter, or concentric to it.) > > The major problems with M lenses on other cameras would still be corner > smearing and color shifts, unless the sensor's Bayer array was designed for > M lenses. And would the autofocus be fast and accurate enough, and would > using the adapter be convenient enough that you wouldn't get fed up with it > quickly? > > Personally, I'd love to have an autofocus M that also did RF focusing. But > as Larry mentions, it would have to be worth someone's while to > manufacture. Most manufacturers have already passed on making their own > rangefinder mechanism. Leica seems to be willing to make RF cameras along > traditional M lines, but not to do anything radical with them. But what > about something entirely new by a third party--an AF camera that also did > some sort of visual rangefinder simulation in an EVF, and was designed to > take M lenses. Ideally, the version for M lenses would have a Bayer array > with microlens offsets licensed from Leica. The SLR lens version would > have a more conventional sensor. > > All technically possible. The big question is whether there are enough > legacy(*) lens fans, and in particular M lens fans, to make such a camera > commercially viable. > > --Peter, who actually dislikes the word "legacy." > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Larry Zeitlin via LUG < > lug at leica-users.org> > wrote: > > > About 40 years ago, give or take a decade, a precision camera make, > > probably Zeiss. marketed a camera in which the focus was adjusted by > moving > > the film plane. This simplified lenses but had the downsides of increased > > expense for the camera body and the difficulty of providing enough motion > > for long focus lenses. The idea was abandoned after a few years but I > > believe that with modern electronics it could provide automatic focus > for M > > lenses. But, of course, there would be little incentive for Leica to > adopt > > such a system. Maybe a third party could sell a universal camera which > > would autofocus with all makers lenses. > > Larry Z > > > > + + + > > LUG: > > > > Any idea whether this would actually work or not? > > > > > > > http://www.thephoblographer.com/2016/02/11/the-techart-pro-lens-adapter-promises-autofocus-for-leica-m-mount-glass/#.VrywD_krJaQ > > > > Tina > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >