Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2015/11/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Verizon)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:17:41 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1D=cphW6jKE02H0j-oyU7gYq_kkXUH6JHij+rV+puQ-TA@mail.gmail.com> <69760AA6-0CC7-4C75-8922-F57E087D1C84@verizon.net> <CA+yJO1C_0jh8_Fha-64MjWM91JKwwMUinbDNvtXYYhs-wmg0hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Look at the positives... You won't need that Pilates class any more
Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net
The LS with the 24-90 lens weighs 2095! It's a heavy lens; however, the
Canon with my favorite Canon lens 85/1.2 weighs 2623 grams. It's a monster!
Replies:
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux)
In reply to:
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Verizon) ([Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux)