Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree, Sonny. And, if I read correctly, doing away with the unnecessary frills allowed the menu system to be simplified, which is a step in the right direction for old geezers like me and a few others. :-) Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA On 11/19/2015 4:07 PM, Sonny Carter wrote: > Frank, it's not a matter of the money; it's buying the camera you need. > > I've had several still camera with video capability, and have only shot > video with any of them accidentally. > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Frank Verizon <red735i at verizon.net> > wrote: > >> I agree with Mark. The customer base that Leica is chasing does not have >> a significant problem with the extra $2k for the top of the line vs a >> dumbed down model. In fact, if you are buying your first Leica, and you >> represent a certain luxury market segment, purchasing a less than ultimate >> model is a failure. >> >> The reality of the 262 is that the differences are or at least appear to >> be totally firmware issues over the M240. >> >> Nice marketing idea to have 240 users buy a new second body and new to >> Leica users to have a need to buy glass, where Leica really makes money. >> >> Frank Filippone >> Red735i at verizon.net >> >> On Nov 19, 2015, at 2:12 PM, John Lee <jwlee01 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Leica Camera announces new Leica M type 262. >> >> <http://lavidaleica.com/content/leica-announces-m-type-262-camera> >> >> -John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >