Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Help! How many Megapixels needed?
From: lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:51:47 -0400

        Here is a question discussed at a recent photo show. I had no good 
answer.
        
        When I first got involved in digital photography almost two decades 
ago I was advised by engineers at the Kodak research lab that all of the 
information on a 35mm Kodachrome slide could be contained in 13.5 
megapixels. They felt that it would take almost a century to reach that 
point. (Most of those engineers are now looking for other jobs.) Remember 
that the first antediluvian digital cameras had only .3 megapixels of 
resolution. Film, they said, would be safe for many years. That 13.5 
megapixel estimate seemed to take on a life of its own. The 4/3s format as 
finally released was 14 megapixels (now 16 Mp.) and the Leica M8 and first 
DSLRs were content with less. My first digital Leica had a 1.3 megapixel 
sensor. I have owned cameras with 3,5 Mp, 5 Mp, 10 and 12 Mp, and 16 Mp. All 
produced very good results to the naked eye. Admittedly I didn?t use a 
magnifying glass to explore the details of the image. But then who does?
        Now cameras are marketed with 24, 32, and 64 megapixel sensors. Even 
the iPhone has 8 megapixels. Does it make any difference or is it simply a 
marketing tool. Theoretically visual quality should improve as the square 
root of the megapixel count but the electrical complexity of the computation 
and the display requirements are directly proportional to the pixel count of 
the sensor. Even Apple, a company that never backed away from complex 
systems, needs only 5.5 megapixels to drive a 27? Thunderbolt display. I 
view most of the LUG output on a 13? Mac Pro laptop screen and the work 
appears perfectly adequate.
        For people that want to produce 11? x 14? to 16? x 20? prints or 
publish their work in most consumer magazines, not display gigantic Colorama 
sized prints from minuscule portions of the frame area, does the number of 
pixels really matter? Inquiring minds want to know.
        Larry Z



Replies: Reply from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] OT: Help! How many Megapixels needed?)