Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica SL weight comparison.....
From: imra at (Douglas Barry)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:01:29 +0100
References: <011901d10d53$5b79a340$126ce9c0$> <0b0701d10d68$d57af4e0$8070dea0$> <2E36DAEA6E474AA683C1C28825F74647@Family> <>

Gerry, you're right of course!
Damn that pedant's hat I put on this morning: its built-in blindfold 
sometimes obscures the obvious!!! :-)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerry Walden" <gerry.walden at>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica SL weight comparison.....

> Douglas
> I hate to argue but 1,014.5kg makes it over a tonne in weight which it may 
> feel when it has hung around your neck for a while but I am sure is wrong.
> Gerry
>> On 23 Oct 2015, at 11:29, Douglas Barry <imra at> wrote:
>> In Ireland - still part of Europe, it's 1,014.5 kg, and in progressive 
>> openminded parts of the UK where it's also Europe, it's that too. In 
>> Switzerland as well, if I remember.
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

In reply to: Message from red735i at (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica SL weight comparison.....)
Message from john at (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica SL weight comparison.....)
Message from imra at (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Leica SL weight comparison.....)
Message from gerry.walden at (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Leica SL weight comparison.....)