Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] If not Lightroom, ...
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:11:05 +0200
References: <2729378.1444849721738.JavaMail.root@mswamui-andean.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Curious, what manipulation do you do? Most of the colour stuff I show is 
unmanipulated.....

john

-----Original Message-----

For myself the tools Photoshop offers that Lightroom doesn't are used pretty 
close to 'everyday'.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


-----Original Message-----
>
>I know it does all that, is that 'everyday' in your use? High +90% of 
>everyday use and Lightroom is fine.....
>
>I was asking what Mark does in PS that he cannot do in LR for normal 
>use......
>
>john
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>Well stitched panoramas for one thing.
>
>Masking - Lightroom?s tools can do some auto masking that is pretty neat, 
>but the Photoshop offers significant, indeed a vast set of tools for 
>selection and masking that Lightroom simply doesn?t offer.
>
>Layers - combined with masking, as above, Photoshop allows adjustments to 
>portions of an image based upon, for example: color or tonality allowing 
>for adjustment to narrow ranges that LR cannot match.
>
>Change of color space - being able to shift into Lab color space allows 
>for an exploration of image color that staying inside a traditional RGB 
>image does not. (I?m somewhat convinced that some of the tricks that LR 
>plays involves a shift into Lab color space on the fly)
>
>A variety of tools for sharpening. LR does a good job but for large prints 
>Photoshop?s sharpening options do a better job than LR.
>
>It?s a matter of approach. I find for making a final print I can get part 
>of the way there in LR but for the final print it?s Photoshop the rest of 
>the way. For the screen LR works almost all the time.
>
>That?s my experience and my approach. LR takes the nearly bewildering array 
>of tools and methods and narrows them down into, essentially, Camera Raw. 
>If you need anything beyond CR then Photoshop is where you go.
>
>Adam Bridge
>
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 10:10 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr 
>> <mailto:john at mcmaster.fr>> wrote:
>> 
>> What do you do with your pictures in Photoshop that cannot be done in 
>> Lightroom? Genuine question.
>> 
>> I have used PS since early versions, looking at 2015 CC there is 
>> little comparison to earlier versions so why hark back to LR v1?
>> 
>> john
>





In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)