Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My 50 for the blad is fantastic, my most used lens, but I must say the 250 came in a close second. I'm just sorry I never got a superwide when I could have made money with it. They are sublime -----Original Message----- From: Mark Rabiner Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:21 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Don't Trust Everything You Read On The Internet, or: 2 Myths of the Biogon Lens On 4/23/15 5:44 PM, "George Lottermoser" <george.imagist at icloud.com> wrote: > And the 60s through 80s 'blad Zeiss glass, that I own, definitely always > pleases the eyes. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser George the Hassy wides, 40 through 60 were as I'm sure you know retrofocal wides just like you'd find on any SLR or beam splitter unite camera its not symmetrical at all as there has to be nothing going backwards into the camera body very much getting in the way of stuff. But in the case of these Zeiss Distagon's made for a Hassy and also perhaps for Rollei and Alpa these were beyond the standards of the industry. They were the premium choice for medium format wide angle photography and roll film just like Leitz was for 35mm. If you used a medium format back on a view or technical camera perhaps you'd get to shoot with Schneider Super Angulon (SSA) and just typing those words out makes my heart skip a beat. The look the Zeiss Distagon's brought to the image is imbedded in our collective minds from all the commercial and magazine photography we'd ever seen especially before they got competition from the Japanese camera industry in the 80's with medium format Mamiya, Bronica and Pentax which undercut them by quite a bit on the price point. -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information