Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Interesting. i remember several years ago everyone was praising the 28 Chron. I wonder what has changed? Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2015 3:06:51 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Screw the Nocti... If I do street documentary, I would get a 28mm (again) for sure. I did most of my "Occupy" series with the 35 or 50mm, and I definitely would have loved a 28mm. Fortunately, the 28mm Cron is the unloved Leica-child, so one can get it for around $2500 now. A bargain compares to the Nocti :-) On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > Hi Mark, I think you should go back a reread your books ;-) > > john > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Rabiner > Sent: Monday, 6 April 2015 6:08 a.m. > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Screw the Nocti... > > Most of us and most photographers I've ever met unless they were just > starting out had both a 28 and a 24. Nobody ever didn't have either. That > would be crazy. Its always been a basic focal length. Its one of the frame > lines in M's since the M2 in 1957. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto // https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information