Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Shoot less... ?
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:03:04 +0000
References: <D133497D.35955%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
I have never heard of photographers considering their work by the acreage of 
film they use rather than the number of worthwhile results they get. Is this 
common?

> On 21 Mar, 2015, at 20:14, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
> A dozen sheets of 8x10 equal 144 shots with a Rolleiflex or Hasselblad.
> 432 shots with in 35mm. Also par for the course. A very common occurrence.
> 
> I shot 10 rolls a pro pack of Delta 100 of one model once in a few hours.
> So I had 360 chances to get it right.
> That was the most concentrated I ever got.
> My Balcars afterwards were quite warm. But they cooled down in time.
> I needed a cold shower for sure.
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Shoot less... ?)
Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Shoot less... ?)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Shoot less... ?)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Shoot less... ?)