Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] For trade? Or, maybe I'm just way off base.
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:54:59 +0100
References: <FDA24E92-4FDA-43D4-99A2-742713D99847@icloud.com> <CA+yJO1B4J-H5ANyW67czoMDLkgEbJ4kNpwQVunN+OtjoL0aRxw@mail.gmail.com> <B8BE1D0C-5B75-4D98-83E6-09C6DE500B4C@icloud.com>

Susan,

I had (and I still have) similar hesitations as you have, before to take my 
decision I was lucky because a friend was visit Barcelona and borrowed me 
his MM and his Noctilux V3, I?ve shoot the same pictures with my Summilux 50 
V2 (an excellent lens) and with his Nocti, in both cases wide open, in my 
opinion the only difference is the effect of DOF (Bokeh) the rendition?. I 
think is identicall, please take a look:

Summilux
<https://www.flickr.com/photos/lluisripoll/14525732505/in/set-72157648957616801/>

Noctilux
<https://www.flickr.com/photos/lluisripoll/14339139459/in/set-72157648957616801/>

My thoughts are close to yours, I like the smooth ?imperfection? of the 
pre-asph lenses, I?m using in my MM the Summilux 35 pre and it works pretty 
well.

I have more samples of the test if you want see them

Good luck, be patient, it took to me several months find ?my? MM

Cheers
Lluis



El 07/12/2014, a las 00:40, Susan Ryan <skalte at icloud.com> escribi?:

> Lluis and Ariana, thank you so much for your inputs. Based on your 
> comments, I am leaning towards prioritizing buying a good used MM over a 
> 1.0 if I can't afford both after selling the .95. 
> 
> Sue
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 6, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sue,
>> 
>> For what it's worth, since I got my M240 and MM I have hardly used the
>> Noctilux at all.  The higher ISOs on those two cameras are so much better,
>> I almost never need 1.0.  If you just like it for the shallow depth of
>> field or bokeh, that would would be different, but I find it so hard to
>> focus, I have to take 4x as many photos to get any in focus!!
>> 
>> Good luck with whatever you decide.  You will love the MM.
>> 
>> Tina
>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Susan Ryan <skalte at icloud.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> After seeing Perter's Monochrom photos and Steve's Nocti 1.0 photo, I'm
>>> experiencing som ennui. I'm also kind of just disgusted with myself for
>>> even asking this question. Would it be a bad idea or less then equitable
>>> either way, to try to swap my 1.5 year old, used only a handful of times,
>>> Nocti .95 for a used Monochrom and Nocti 1.0 combo? I would really love a
>>> Monochrom (I have an M9 I am not interested in selling) and I really 
>>> prefer
>>> the Nocti 1 to the .95 bokeh. I'm not somone who sells and re-buys
>>> equipment. What I have is wonderful. Just wondering if I am missing
>>> something thinking this could be a fair trade if I found an interested,
>>> trustworty dealer or LUG member.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> Sue
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tina Manley
>> www.tinamanley.com
>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from skalte at icloud.com (Susan Ryan) ([Leica] For trade? Or, maybe I'm just way off base.)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] For trade? Or, maybe I'm just way off base.)
Message from skalte at icloud.com (Susan Ryan) ([Leica] For trade? Or, maybe I'm just way off base.)