Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought sticking with film made me an esoteric idiot....Although not poor. On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > If I swung the money I'd have a hard time deciding between the current M > and > the Monochrom down to the last minute.. Its certainly foolish to not have > both? I mean what would be the point?!? I certainly hope they keep > developing the Monochrom and don't let it just sit there. The next version > should have selenium toning built in.. With a button you press on the left. > > On 10/12/14 4:00 AM, "Peter A. Klein" <pklein at threshinc.com> wrote: > > > I'm already esoteric. I try not to be an idiot. I'm not rich, and if I > > buy an M 240, I would be even less so. For some reason, I'm more drawn > > to the Monchorom than the M 240. If I bought a Monochrom, I would be > > equally not rich and even more esoteric. And a lot of people would think > > I was an idiot. > > > > I feel like Rodney Dangerfield. :-) > > > > --Peter > > > > Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> So when we spend seven grand on an M instead of a Canon or Nikon body > > we are > >> in good company and not feeling like some kinds of rich esoteric idiot. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > -- > Mark William Rabiner > Photographer > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Chris Saganich www.imagebrooklyn.com