Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:17:37 +0100
References: <691D806F-5CF8-4978-A732-CC92EE7320C6@gmail.com> <147ACEEE-683E-4187-A415-BB22074F601D@frozenlight.eu>

Nathan,

I agree with your statement, I didn?t had the intention to do a test, just 
the coincidence I have shoot at the same place and same aperture and I?ve 
compared, now I want do a test as you say, I love both lenses fingerprint 
and I didn?t expect that they show such differences in contrast. I love too 
the Collapsible, with film I didn?t remark it was very different to the 
Rigid.

Thank you!

Un abrazo
Lluis


El 07/12/2014, a las 10:17, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
escribi?:

> My kind of lens testing :-) 
> 
> But I cannot really tell the lenses apart based on a web image. Also, 
> since you shot them on different days, the conditions (light etc.) were 
> similar but not identical, so you cannot really call it a test.
> 
> But who cares? The images are nice :-) I have the collapsible Summicron 
> too, and I am very pleased with it.
> 
> Un abrazo,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> 
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> 
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
> 
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 07 Dec 2014, at 01:12, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at 
> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> In different days in the same place, aperture was 2.8 in all cases 
>> (except the second picture the EIXIF indicates 2.4), with Leica MM
>> 
>> Also same photographer and same film?.he?he..
>> 
>> The two first are with Summicron Collapsible
>> 
>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001505LR5.jpg.html>
>> 
>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001506LR5.jpg.html>
>> 
>> The two second with the Summicron Rigid
>> 
>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000188LR5.jpg.html>
>> 
>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000189LR5.jpg.html>
>> 
>> I want repeat the test, doing it the same day and same processing, but in 
>> my opinion the renditions are different, the collapsible gives more 
>> Contrast and the Rigid more smoothness and grey tones.
>> 
>> Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated
>> 
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Comparing Summicron Collapsible and Rigid)