Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] High Res M9 Portrait (how sharp is sharp enough?)
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:02:20 +0200
References: <FB9FD655-FA44-4733-8FD9-DE468294F2D9@gmail.com>

Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. But I loved this pic on FB and I love it 
here.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator

YNWA













On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:00, kyle cassidy on the LUG <leicaslacker at 
gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> In reading lens reviews I?ll often see something like ?this portrait lens 
> really starts to shine at f5.6? and I think ?f5.6? who in their right mind 
> would ever stop down to f5.6 with a portrait lens? Open it up all the way 
> and solder down the aperture ring." But then occasionally I think ?eek, my 
> DOF is a little narrow there? and I resign myself to the possibility that, 
> occasionally, f4 is warranted if you want to get both the lion and the 
> gazelle in focus. 
> 
> Not that I?ll likely ever do it, but I?ll accept it may be true.
> 
> Here?s a high res portrait that may or may not be sharp enough.
> 
> http://www.kylecassidy.com/lj/2014/stars-flower-high-res.jpg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] High Res M9 Portrait (how sharp is sharp enough?))
In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG) ([Leica] High Res M9 Portrait (how sharp is sharp enough?))