Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] [OM] And now a Lightroom question
From: abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:47:28 -0800
References: <D0A3E632.2D52F%mark@rabinergroup.com> <C5C34CA8-A5F8-4F79-8327-D00D1DBD1CA9@gmail.com>
 
I'm spot-on with Bob on this. Having figured out how to use Lightroom for 
asset management, keywording, etc, it's terrific. 

In concert with Photoshop it's fabulous. I tend to do a first-cut in LR and 
then do the tweaking in Photoshop. I've been working more and more in Lab 
color space, especially for autumn images and landscapes. I think that LR 
actually does some of its work in Lab behind the scenes but I can't be sure 
of that and I don't know anyone at Adobe to ask. And for printing LR is 
great.

Adam

> On 2014 Dec 2, at 7:55 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The combo of LR for asset management (keeping your photos organized and 
> ranked/sortable) and initial raw processing, and Photoshop for refined 
> development is, IMO, unbeatable. 
> Now that you can create an ACR layer in Photoshop, LR may be only needed 
> for organizing.
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] [OM] And now a Lightroom question)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] [OM] And now a Lightroom question)