Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] was Mamiya 6 now Square
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:41:36 -0400

Here (at the bottom) it says "Variants of the M3 were made for specific
purposes. The Leica 24x27 was a camera with neither rangefinder nor
viewfinder, made for the postal service to photograph electricity meters."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leica_M3

On 7/21/14 5:30 PM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> 24mm x 27mm I think, there was also th 126 film format....
> 
> john
> ________________________________________
> 
> 
> And there as the Leica Postal. 24x24mm. Made in small amounts with a 
> special
> lens which was pre set to a few feet away... and. which I cant find on the
> internet so maybe I dreamt it.
> 
> 
> And
> LEICA 'VNIOO' 24X24MM NEGATIVE CARRIER FOR VALOY II & FOCOMAT
> 
> 
> On 7/21/14 12:59 PM, "Douglas Barry" <imra at iol.ie> wrote:
> 
>> They did make 24x24 and you can get a Zeiss Ikon Tenax II on eBay right 
>> now,
>> but it only has the 2.8 Tessar and not the 2.0 Sonnar. It's hip to be
>> square....
>> 
>> Douglas
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:26 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Mamiya 6
>> 
>> 
>>> If they made a 24x24mm format 35mm camera who knows how much more film
>>> would
>>> have been shot?
>>> Why not make a square format digital camera? Or one with that format in
>>> the
>>> options? I'd buy one!
>>> Its great to never have to turn your camera on its side.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7/21/14 5:17 AM, "Chris Crawford" <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Richard. I am still shooting the Mamiya 6! I used it with the
>>>> 50mm
>>>> lens and Ilford Delta 3200 film at EI-1600 for this photo. That let me
>>>> handhold the shot; it was early evening and this is in the shade because
>>>> of the trees. The exposure was 1/30 at f11.
>>>> 
>>>> The Mamiya 6 is wonderful. I have always loved 6x6; the square format
>>>> works for my work well (though I did crop this photo a bit on the 
>>>> sides),
>>>> but other 6x6 cameras I have used were not really handholdable. I had a
>>>> Mamiya C330f when I was younger, and shot my art school graduation
>>>> project
>>>> on it:
>>>> 
>>>> http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/chris-results.php?category=60
>>>> 
>>>> Loved the image quality, and the fact that the camera and lenses were
>>>> inexpensive, but it was too heavy for me to hold, and using it on a
>>>> tripod
>>>> was a pain because of the waist level finder (I know they made a prism,
>>>> but I didn't have one...was a poor student then). I had to sell it after
>>>> college because I needed money. Later, I was able to get a Hasselblad.
>>>> Same problems, except I did have a prism for it, but the lenses were 
>>>> very
>>>> heavy. Sold it and got the Mamiya 6 a year and a half ago.
>>>> 
>>>> Wish I'd just begun with the Mamiya 6, it is perfect. I had not shot a
>>>> single frame of 35mm film since getting it, until last week when I shot 
>>>> a
>>>> roll to use for a developing demonstration for someone who paid me to
>>>> teach her to develop film. The student (who is actually a high school 
>>>> art
>>>> teacher) shoots only 35, so I used it for my lesson.
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] was Mamiya 6 now Square)