Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 18:53:03 -0500 (CDT)
 
Actually I find my pre-asph 35 Summilux performs better on my M8 than on my 
M6TTL, and it is not coded.

Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pablo Kolodny" <pkolodny1 at icloud.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2014 6:36:48 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question

John,

could you please extend on that ? 

Pablo



On Apr 5, 2014, at 8:36 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> My 35mm Summilux pre-asph (coded as a Summicron) and f1 Noctilux give very 
> different looks between coded and uncoded...
> 
> john


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
 In reply to: Message from pkolodny1 at icloud.com (Pablo Kolodny) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)