Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Tina,? Glad you wrote and thanks for the help, sure it does help. Whatever it comes from you...? So you have three, at least, M digital bodies. And you see the M files coming out with wider tonal range, right ? Do they also seem to you a bit sharper than the color bodies ? Do you have any real comparison the kind of real prints one by the side of the other ?? I?m not a big fan of sharpness but of tonal range though... you know, the sharper the files the better even without our permission.? I can?t relay too much on what I find in monitors, you know, old discussion this is. But I much prefer to rely on your personal experience and opinion. And would also like to hear from you how the M files/prints compare to your older film prints. Sorry to insist but I think THE point is there, on how these files end up in a print that comes from digital files when you look at them by the side of your prints coming from film.? Regards Pablo On Apr 04, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: Welcome back, Pablo! I have the M9, MM, and M240. When I want B&W, I use the MM. All you have to do is look at some raw files to see the difference. The dynamic range and fine details are much better with the MM. There is a difference in the tonality. I don't know how to explain it, but I can see it. Google it to find some examples. There are some of mine from all three cameras on my pBase pages: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/2014&page=11 Hope this helps! Tina