Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica's heyday?
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:18:52 +0100
References: <35376F428B6549FF8DD64B156C687E48@Family> <6b212797a7b720868ff4e73cf5a0cb41@mail.gmail.com> <3A127495-2220-474F-8A3F-9CA40BA8E2E9@acm.org>

Herbert,

IIRR, it was the photographer who shot the Hindenburg 
disaster at Lakehurst.

Cheers
Douglas


On 26.02.2014 09:04, Herbert Kanner wrote:
> I read a legend many years ago. Perhaps one of you LUGers can fill in some 
> details. In the days when they all used Speed Graphics, one photographer 
> for a New York paper (I think it was the Daily News) did an assignment 
> using a Leica. His editor told him that if he ever again used that toy 
> camera on an assignment, he?d be fired.
>
> Herbert Kanner
> kanner at acm.org
> 650-326-8204
>
> Question authority and the authorities will question you.
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Jim Shulman <jshulman at judgecrater.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Was the Leica ever a pre-eminent press camera?  During the LTM and M3
>> heyday of the 50s, Rolleis and larger format cameras still prevailed.  By
>> the time most press photographers turned to 35mm, the SLR era was in full
>> swing (with Leica a distant player).
>>
>> Leica really outshined the larger format cameras in the street, in the
>> battlefield, as a sidekick in the car or for a walk, etc. Just not in the
>> wolfpack of a photo opportunity.
>>
>> Jim Shulman
>> Wynnewood, PA
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On 
>> Behalf Of
>> Douglas Barry
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:24 PM
>> To: lug at leica-users.org
>> Subject: [Leica] Leica's heyday?
>>
>> I presume it is now in terms of users, but in terms of being the cutting
>> edge and dominant tool as interpreted by its press corps usage, when was
>> it?
>>
>> Did it ever exist? Was it just a cadre of influential photographers that
>> got them for free who popularised Leica? Anybody know?
>>
>> It certainly wasn't in 1959 when this Ekberg photo was taken, as I pointed
>> out in an earlier post, there are no Leicas to be seen. However, I may be
>> going blind and missed one. Have a look at the photo of all the cameramen
>> at the bottom of the plane's steps. But none of you commented on the
>> absence of Leicas at the time.
>>
>> http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20140220-pictures-we-love-to-hate
>>
>> Do we owe Leica worship to HCB, or to whom - a clever early marketeer in
>> Solms?
>>
>> Douglas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>



Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Leica's heyday?)
In reply to: Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Leica's heyday?)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Leica's heyday?)
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] Leica's heyday?)