Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM
From: leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:31:57 -0800
References: <BC511A43-E8FE-4E30-9A1B-B4A599FAC338@mac.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E6837C41@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

Having both cameras in my bag now, John is exactly right. Same goes for 
prints.

Jay

On 1/27/2014 1:37 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> If you see the original, rather than a small jpeg, the tonality in the 
> Monochrom is much better than a converted M9 IMO
>
> john


-- 
Jay,

Jay Burleson Gallery <http://jayburleson.com/leica/gallery/index.php/>
"Being a Leica customer is like dating the most beautiful girl in the 
world...
who cares more about herself than you... but, you keep calling her back 
anyway...
because the sex is so good... most of the time." (RickLeica on LUF)


In reply to: Message from robert.rose at mac.com (Robert Rose) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)