Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The latest about Photo ethics in a war zone
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:35:07 +1100
References: <6150690D-D9EA-439B-A517-1EA372772562@gmail.com> <CAAsXt4MmCOwPLnRvnFyfeDzcf0VCsruU-93qVLo-vYyyJRAboA@mail.gmail.com>

So it is quite OK to artificially set up a shot by getting the combatant to
pose dramatically at very close range right next to the media foxhole
equipped with video and stills equipment plus at least two journalists.
That is 'real' but cloning out the video equipment is not????


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 26 January 2014 03:53, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> He should have used one of the new trees available in CC. Perhaps with
> Happy Vines?
> :-/
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Greg Rubenstein <gcr910 at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
> > So much for photorealism -- even in a war zone.
> >
> >
> >
> http://photoblog.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/22/22406204-ap-severs-ties-with-pulitzer-winning-photographer-for-ethics-breach?lite
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Adler
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] The latest about Photo ethics in a war zone)
Reply from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] The latest about Photo ethics in a war zone)
In reply to: Message from gcr910 at gmail.com (Greg Rubenstein) ([Leica] The latest about Photo ethics in a war zone)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] The latest about Photo ethics in a war zone)