Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim, these were posts to the LUG or to me? I assume to the LUG, but then I don't understand why you and Lluis had problems while other responses did appear on the list. The mysteries of e-mail ;-) Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On Jan 22, 2014, at 3:19 AM, Jim Nichols wrote: > Lluis, > > I had two of my responses to Nathan's postings returned last night, and I > have made no change in my email address. It has not happened with mail to > anyone else. There is something in Nathan's post that is being considered > spam. > > You might try deleting his post when sending the response. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > On 1/21/2014 7:50 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote: >> Nathan, >> >> I?ve modified my e-mail address and for two times my e-mail was returned, >> I can?t understand because I?ve verified my sending account before to >> send it? well, the text is this one: >> >> Nathan, >> >> Nice and a great variety of pics here. I like very much the light on the >> the three first night pics, amazing story of your friend Lars, 3_7 made >> me smile, 3_10 is wonderful and my favorite, 3_17 a lovely image in a >> smooth and sweet B&W, and 3_20 a great detail for not forget the history. >> >> Un abrazo, >> Lluis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >