Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Otus
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:17:30 -0800
References: <018b01cf1677$e03988e0$a0ac9aa0$@verizon.net> <3AD830FD-07B6-4453-8DF6-812284EA3EF6@gmail.com>

I'm not sure the Otus is worth the weight disadvantage in light of how good
the Zeiss that is made for the Sony is.  See
http://3d-kraft.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=151&catid=40&Itemid=2&limitstart=1

Also, my metabones M to E adapter was terrible (Novoflex fine).  It has
made me reluctant to buy the metabones Canon to E adapter, though many seem
to use it.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Steve Barbour
>
> On Jan 20, 2014, at 11:10 PM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i at verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
> Popflash has an Otus in stock...  I think it fits the Sony, but not sure..
>
> for Canon
>
>
>
>
>
> Frank Filippone
>
> Red735i at verizon.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Zeiss Otus)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Zeiss Otus)
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Zeiss Otus)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Zeiss Otus)