Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M (typ 240) testing
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:30:13 -0600
References: <CAE3QcF6Xy9wXnLNqVPJGAFTtM1xsQj6FONacp17uQUd8WGBSZw@mail.gmail.com>

Glad your babies came home, Geoff.  It sounds as if the work was well done.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 1/9/2014 8:09 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> My camera and Summilux M 50 ASPH. are just back from Germany after repair
> from impact and I've shot a little to check the accuracy of the calibration
> firstly. The physical aspects of the servicings are faultless. That was an
> expensive fall in Barcelona, by the way. Thank heavens for insurance.
>
> I was told that the camera was serviced and calibrated first, then the lens
> which was checked against the camera adjustments. I'm very pleased to say
> that the focus adjustment is very very good, both of the RF compared to
> magnified liveview and the lens at critical DoF settings. I tested at one
> and two metres from f/1.4 down and I estimate from my tests that the
> sharpest plane is perhaps within a couple of millimetres. Much closer than
> probable variation when I'm handholding.
>
> I noticed some interesting additional aspects during testing.
>   Overall. focus peaking shows the focus plane shift very clearly as you
> focus on a patterned target.
> Operating with a loupe looking at the 10x liveview on the LCD (a very
> artificial test) I can see that the range of 'in focus' is coarser than
> with the RF. That is to say, with a clear target pattern, the RF is just
> plain more accurate by far.
>
> I've been told more than once that the RF in the new camera is adjusted to
> finder tolerances than ever before and with new equipment and also that the
> technicians are finding that the new camera is sensitive to lens
> calibration.
>
> One other item I noticed is that Lightroom 5 reported exactly the aperture
> used from f/2 to f/8 with my 75. Typically those aperture estimates might
> be within 1/2 to 1 stop. A happy coincidence perhaps
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>




Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] M (typ 240) testing)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] M (typ 240) testing)