Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's not an "end" of cameras, since we are still left with image capturing devices that are far more integrated part of our fabric. It means that images will be distributed far more widely and far more seamlessly than it ever was. Of course, photography as an art form will remain, just as paintings and classical music are still with us. It is not the tool that matters. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:15 AM, <lrzeitlin at aol.com> wrote: > It is VERY cold today, snowing, and a blizzard is forecast for this > evening. I've gassed the snowblower, filled the generator tank and made > sure we have plenty of food for the next few days. Now I have plenty of > time to read. > One of the most interesting and perceptive articles on current trends in > photography that I have seen in some time is by Craig Mod in the current > issue of the New Yorker magazine. It's really worth a read. What do Luggers > think about his conclusions? > Larry Z > From: The New Yorker <NewYorker at newsletter.newyorker.com> > Subject: The End of Cameras; and more > Date: January 2, 2014 11:39:33 AM EST > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Ken Iisaka first name at last name dot org or com