Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/12/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctilux
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:25:06 +0000
References: <6E419175-7D02-4D0C-9C7B-8B79E223F8D8@yahoo.com.sg> <20052A61-22AE-4B1C-929E-29D629781F36@archiphoto.com>

Noctiluxii are very good stopped down, only reason to buy them over a 
Summilux asph is to use them wide open. .....

John

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> If you have the Summilux ASPH and an M240, the 0.95 is not as necessary as
> it was with the M9, but it of course still allows a little but lower light 
> subjects
> to be recorded successfully (as long as they are at least one meter away)
> with shallower dof, but the f/1 will allow a different vision, if you are 
> willing
> and able to master it.
> 
> I used to have an f/1.2, have used the f/0.95 and the Nokton f/1.1 and
> currently have the f/1 and the Summilux ASPH.
> 
> Henning
> 
> 
> 
> On 2013-12-30, at 9:30 PM, David Ching <davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg>
> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Emanuel,
> >
> > The Noct f0.95 is surely superior in some ways to the Lux 50 ASPH or the
> Voightlander Nokton f1.1 of the later two which I  have.
> > How would you rate the 3 Noct versions , f0.95, f1.0 and f1.2?
> >
> >
> >
> > David Ching
> >
> >


In reply to: Message from davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching) ([Leica] Noctilux)
Message from hjwulff at gmail.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Noctilux)