Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The one from Solms seems to work OK anyway.;-) http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/stvm http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/mvm Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 29 December 2013 11:36, Mark Kronquist <mak at teleport.com> wrote: > Why is wetzlar better. Real life. Not Germans better than canadians > > Sent from my iPad > > On Dec 28, 2013, at 4:46 PM, EPL <manolito at videotron.ca> wrote: > > Opinions are a dime a dozen. >> >> In fact the Wetzlar f1.2 Noctilux is superior to the Midland f1.0 in every >> way except speed. >> >> It is easily the equal of -- or better than -- the first 50mm Summilux >> too. >> It's a beautiful lens that handles well on the M camera. >> >> Having said that, in the kind of trashy condition of the lens in question >> on >> eBay, I would not put more than $3500 on it, which is obviously not going >> to >> get it in today's market. >> >> In my opinion, the price of these lenses has been cooked way too hot in >> the >> past few years. Ditto for the f1.0. >> >> Methinks one's best bet now for a fast shooter's 50mm would be the >> Summilux >> ASPH or one of the Voigtlander lenses. >> >> Emanuel >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >